The Ravings of the Nowhere King

RSS

paperseverywhere:

He’s never gonna live it down

A bit late, but happy birthday you doof.

ramjet94:

Remember how Teen Titans had a lesson about Racism without blatantly bringing Cyborg’s Race into it?

(Source: attackoncat)

themagicmissile:

Art by Choi Won Chun, aka Doo

themagicmissile:

Art by Choi Won Chun, aka Doo

thecyberwolf:

Legend of the Cryptids

Artist: Marat Ars

did-you-kno:

Source

did-you-kno:

Source

kilosophy:

oh shit

(Source: sizvideos)

turtlesshell:

doctorbun:

lemonteaflower:

genocidershodan:

lemonteaflower:

anxiety.

Or, you know, you could just stop saying sorry.

"i have a problem i can’t control" 

"stop having that problem omg" 

????¿¿¿¿???? 

Hello Friends! Anxiety is a serious problem for many people in today’s society. Instead of getting angry at people for having these issues, it is always ALWAYS better to help them c: If you or anyone you know has issues with anxiety on any scale, I have good news for you! There is something you can do about it! Through coping skills and support you can both manage your anxiety and live a happy and healthy life without having to worry about those horrible stomach turning feelings you get every time you encounter one of your stressors. -Doctor Bun xx 

hello
as someone with anxiety i can contest that while the anxiety itself is not controllable your reaction to it is (with practice.)
the above comment excellently explains this and gives good advice.

you should never get angry at someone for something they can’t control. but don’t ever think that just because you can’t control it’s occurrence doesn’t mean you can’t change what you do about those feelings.

nomellamesfriki:

Metal Slug

(Source: cerror)

of course you don’t fight fire with fire, but you do fight it by suffocating it, drowning it, or stomping it out. you dont stop fire by just standing there and asking it nicely “please dont burn my neighborhood down”

- (via tigerthevampirequeen)

(Source: sugarlesshoney)

sparklingganymede:

tyleroakley:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.
So you might end up with more donuts.
But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?
Hrm.
HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.
tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

Thank you donut side of Tumblr.

This is the highest and best use of conic sections I have ever seen.

sparklingganymede:

tyleroakley:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (
R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.


tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

Thank you donut side of Tumblr.

This is the highest and best use of conic sections I have ever seen.

(Source: nimstrz)